Savel'ev D.L. —
Models and mechanisms of interaction of territorial public self-governance with the bodies of local self-governance (on the example of Tyumen)
// Politics and Society. – 2017. – ¹ 3.
– P. 1 - 15.
Read the article
Review: The subject of this research is the mechanisms of organizational and legal regulation of interaction between local self-government state and state of territorial public self-government (TOS) within the boundaries of the city district. The goal of the article consists in analysis of the existing scientific and theoretical approaches that describe the organizational and legal models of interaction of municipal authorities with TOS state, as well as the implementation of mechanisms of citizens' initiatives through TOS structures. Based on the use of theoretical research methods (analysis, synthesis, system method, and modeling) and regulatory legal analysis of municipal legal acts, the author identifies the factors influencing the dynamics of TOS development as one of the forms of citizens' participation in solving local issues. The scientific novelty of the article lies in assessment of work of the TOS in one of the largest municipal okrugs of the south of Tyumen Oblast, as well as development of the proposals for further improvement of the mechanisms of interaction between TOS and public authorities. The author carries out the analysis of legal and organizational mechanisms of interaction between the administration of the city of Tyumen and TOS state alongside ways of their further improvement proceeding from the specifics of the territory. The role of TOS in the system of local self-government of Tyumen in the framework of solving issues of local importance and the development of civil initiatives was determined.
Keywords: participation model, municipal grant, cultural and leisure activities, civic initiatives, technologies of municipal management, territorial public self-governance, local self-governance, agency model, local issues, local area
Aleshkin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya territorial'nogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya kak formy neposredstvennoy demokratii i elementa mestnogo soobshchestva // Pravo i obrazovanie. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 146-153.
Aleshkin A.V. Territorial'noe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2011.-179 s.
Balashova M.V. Territorial'noe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie v kontekste reformirovaniya mestnogo samoupravleniya sovremennoy Rossii: politicheskie aspekty: Avtoref. dis....kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.02. Moskva – 2011.
Bezvikonnaya E.V. Territorial'noe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie kak uslovie realizatsii samoorganizatsionnogo potentsiala mestnogo samoupravleniya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. ¹ 1. 2011. C. 17 – 20.
Byalkina T.M. Problemy kompetentsii organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2006.-¹10.-S. 44 – 51.
Lagunova S.V. Modeli vzaimodeystviya TOS i organov munitsipal'noy vlasti (na materialakh sotsiologicheskikh issledov
Gorban' V.S. —
The teaching of Rudolf von Jhering on law and the Marxism: problem of correlation and interpretation
// Politics and Society. – 2017. – ¹ 3.
– P. 16 - 34.
Read the article
Review: The subject of this research is the problem of comparison, correlation, and interpretation of the link between the sociologically oriented teaching of Jhering on law and the social theory of Marx. Both thinkers, being contemporaries, have developed and formulated the original social theories, in which they referred to the discussion of similar sociopolitical problematic, theoretically substantiating social development and social changes by the use of analogous categories and notions: struggle, interests, and active participation of the contemporaries. However, they remained antagonistic in the initial positions, as well as the answers to the raised questions, thus interpreted the factors of social development very differently. The article analyzes the commonness of the ideological origins of both thinkers in Hegel’s philosophy and their desire to make sense of things. The scientific novelty of this research consists in determination and substantiation of the general and peculiar aspects of social theories of Jhering and Marx. The author demonstrates the complete opposition of the aimed at constant radical reformation of reality socio-revolutionary theory of the Socialist Marx and the liberal -evolutionary, based on the recognition of law as the key factor of development and suggesting the liberal program, of socially active processes of contemporaries, social theory of Jhering. The author concludes that the views of both thinker developed in parallel from the general ideological origins, and did not produce a significant impact upon each other.
Keywords: Social structure, Interests of classes, Interests, Progress of law, Class warfare, Living conditions of society, Struggle for law, Social development, Marx, Jhering
Rudolf von Jhering in Briefen an seine Freunde. Leipzig, 1913, S. 418-419.
Mamut L. Rudolf von Jhering und Wladimir Lenin: Parallelen in ihrem politischen und rechtlichen Denken / von Leonid Mamut // Jherings Rechtsdenken: Theorie und Pragmatik im Dienste evolutionärer Rechtsethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996, S. 110-118.
Jhering R. Der Zweck im Recht / Rudolf von Ihering. Teil: Bd. 2. 4. Aufl. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1905. XXVIII, 568 S
Juristische Blätter. Wien. 17. März 1872. Nr. 3. I. Jahrgang. S. 29-35. (v etom izdanii opublikovan byl tekst neposredstvennogo doklada Ieringa, sostoyavshiy iz dvukh chastey, a takzhe polnyy otchet o sobytiyakh, svyazannykh s vystupleniem Ieringa).
Jhering R. Der Zweck im Recht / Rudolf von Ihering. Teil: Bd. 1. 4. Aufl. / Erste Ausg. in volkstümlicher Gestalt. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1904. XX, 445 S.
Hegel. Die Philosophie des Rechts. Vorlesung von 1821/1822. Frankfurt am Main, 2005. – 240 S.
Gast W. Rechtsver